Comparison
AVACOIN Channel vs Startups & Ventures
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @avagoldcoin | @startupsi |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.8M | 2.6M |
| Avg views | 164,219 | 3,793 |
| Engagement rate | 9.3% | 0.1% |
| 30-day growth | -14.4% | -11.6% |
| Language | Español | Español |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 950 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@avagoldcoin
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@startupsi
Questionable
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.